Sanford v. Higgins et al
ORDER withdrawing the reference; and dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. Sanford's claims due to a lack of prosecution. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/17/2023. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HIGGINS, et al.
Paul Criswell, an inmate at the Pulaski County Detention Facility (“Detention Facility”),
filed this lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of himself and 50 other inmates,
including Plaintiff Bruce Sanford. Doc. 1. Pursuant to Court policy, the Court opened 51 different
lawsuits, including this one for Mr. Sanford
On December 12, 2022, mail from the Court to Mr. Sanford was returned as
“undeliverable.” Doc. 3.
On December 13, 2022, the Court ordered Mr. Sanford to notify the Court of his current
address within 30 days or risk dismissal of his complaint. Doc. 4. To date, he has not responded to
the Court’s December 13 Order, and the time to do so has passed.
The Court withdraws the reference.
Mr. Sanford’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice due to a lack of prosecution. FED.
R. CIV. P. 41(b); Local rule 5.5(c)(2). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be
taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2023.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?