Mayfield v. Sheridan Detention Center
ORDER adopting 80 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 59 motion for summary judgment; allowing Mr. Mayfield to proceed on his medical deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Danny Clark and Ray Vance; g ranting 63 motion for summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Mayfield's claims against Defendant Payne; and instructing the Clerk to terminate Dexter Payne as a party Defendant. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/14/2023. (jb h)Notice: The terminated party will no longer receive filing notifications through CM/ECF. To continue receiving filing notifications, email the Clerk of Court and request reinstatement. Please refer to the CM/ECF Administrative Policies and Procedures for Civil Filings for information about when a terminated party must be served.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
SHERIDAN DETENTION CENTER, et al.
The Court has received a Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. After
careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the
The Court agrees with Judge Ervin’s analysis and recommendation that Mr. Mayfield be
allowed to proceed with his claims against the County Defendants. The Court concludes that the
Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all
The County Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 59) is DENIED. Mr.
Mayfield may proceed on his medical deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Danny
Clark and Ray Vance.
Separate Defendant Dexter Payne’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 63) is
GRANTED. Mr. Mayfield’s claims against Defendant Payne are DISMISSED, without prejudice,
based on his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
The Clerk is instructed to terminate Dexter Payne as a party Defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of November, 2023.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?