Nesdahl v. Hampton et al
Filing
13
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 12 Order, plaintiff Timothy Joseph Nesdahl's 2 complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/27/2024. (ldb)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
TIMOTHY JOSEPH NESDAHL
REG #31388-009
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:23-cv-00495-KGB
MARK HAMPTON, Attorney
at Law, Personal/Business, et al.
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). The relief
sought is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis
appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
So adjudged this 27th day of March, 2024.
_____________________________
Kristine G. Baker
Chief United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
