Nelson Akkub v. Cookley et al

Filing 10

ORDER approving and adopting, in its entirety, 9 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. Akkub's claims; and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Kristine G. Baker on 08/28/2024. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ANTHONY MELATIAH NELSON AKKUB ADC # 098719 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:23-cv-00763-KGB D. COOKLEY, Cpl., individual, Cummins Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff Anthony Melatiah Nelson Akkub’s motion of dismissal of actions (Dkt. No. 8). Mr. Akkub seeks to voluntarily dismiss his action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) (Id., at 1). On October 25, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe submitted a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) in which he recommends that this Court grant Mr. Akkub’s motion of dismissal of actions, dismiss this case without prejudice, and certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal of an Order adopting the Recommendation and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith (Dkt. No. 9, at 2). Mr. Akkub has not filed any objections, and the time to file objections has passed. Accordingly, after careful consideration, the Court approves and adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 9). Mr. Akkub’s claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. It is so ordered this the 28th day of August, 2024. _____________________________ Kristine G. Baker Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?