Hugunin v. Wilson et al
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/13/2023. (ldb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARVEY WILLIAM HUGUNIN
Case No. 4:23-cv-00950-LPR
BILLY ROY WILSON, Judge, et al.
Plaintiff Harvey William Hugunin filed this action pro se.1 On October 10, 2023, the Court
issued an Order denying Mr. Hugunin’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis based on
Mr. Hugunin’s failure to establish his indigency.2 In the Order, the Court gave Mr. Hugunin 30
days to pay the $402 filing fee.3 The Court warned Mr. Hugunin that failure to do so would result
in the dismissal of his case.4
Mr. Hugunin has not complied with, or otherwise responded to, the Court’s October 10
Order, and the time for doing so has expired.
Accordingly, Mr. Hugunin’s Complaint is
DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order or the accompanying
Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November 2023.
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Compl. (Doc. 2).
Order (Doc. 6).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?