Hugunin v. Wilson et al

Filing 7

ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/13/2023. (ldb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
HARVEY WILLIAM HUGUNIN
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 4:23-cv-00950-LPR

BILLY ROY WILSON, Judge, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Plaintiff Harvey William Hugunin filed this action pro se.1 On October 10, 2023, the Court
issued an Order denying Mr. Hugunin’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis based on
Mr. Hugunin’s failure to establish his indigency.2 In the Order, the Court gave Mr. Hugunin 30
days to pay the $402 filing fee.3 The Court warned Mr. Hugunin that failure to do so would result
in the dismissal of his case.4
Mr. Hugunin has not complied with, or otherwise responded to, the Court’s October 10
Order, and the time for doing so has expired.

Accordingly, Mr. Hugunin’s Complaint is

DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order or the accompanying
Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November 2023.
_______________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Compl. (Doc. 2).

2

Order (Doc. 6).

3

Id.

4

Id.