Kent v. Payne et al
Filing
23
ORDER approving and adopting 22 Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, this action; recommending that dismissal of this case count as a "strike" in the future; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/29/2025. (ldb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
MARVIN KENT
ADC #119175
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:23-cv-01219-LPR
DEXTER PAYNE, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Doc. 22). No objections have been filed, and the time for
doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the
entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court’s
findings and conclusions in all respects.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. The Court recommends that dismissal of this case count as a “strike,”
in the future, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment
would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of January 2025.
_______________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?