Jones v. Weekly et al

Filing 19

ORDER approving and adopting 5 Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, 2 Complaint; denying 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 17 , 18 pending motions as moot; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/8/2024. (ldb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION COREY K. JONES ADC #180289 v. PLAINTIFF Case No: 4:24-cv-00454-LPR J. WEEKLY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Doc. 5) and the Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 8).1 After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the Objections and the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court’s findings and conclusions in all respects. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff’s pending motions are DENIED as moot.2 The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July 2024. _______________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 To the extent that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. 10) and Notice (Doc. 14)—or any of the other documents filed after the RD—can be construed as lodging objections to the RD, the Court has considered them as such. 2 These motions include Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. 10), Motion for Supporting Evidence (Doc. 11), Motion to Hold or Retrieve Computer Access (Doc. 12), Motion for Settlement (Doc. 13), Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 16), Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 17), and Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 18). Plaintiff’s proposed amendments cannot remedy the failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?