Frazier v. Baker et al
Filing
19
ORDER adopting, in its entirety, 11 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed with his failure to protect claim against Defendants Woods, Allen, Ellis, and Doe; dismissing, without prejudice, all other claims and Defendants; and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 01/07/2025. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
CARLOS RAY FRAZIER
#650936
PLAINTIFF
v.
4:24-cv-00753-JM-JJV
BAKER, Lieutenant,
Dub Brassell Detention Center, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. No. 11.) No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has passed.
After careful review, this Court adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all
respects.
Therefore, Plaintiff may proceed with his failure to protect claim against Defendants
Woods, Allen, Ellis, and Doe.
All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED without
prejudice. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal
from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 7th day of January, 2025.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?