Rattler v. Barden et al
Filing
5
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, 2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/22/2024. (ldb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
EMONIE DRASHAWN RATTLER
ADC #181884
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:24-cv-00870-LPR-JTK
ROOSEVELT G. BARDEN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff Emonie Drashawn Rattler has not responded to the Court’s October 11, 2024
Order directing him to either pay the $405 statutory filing fee or file a completed Motion to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis within 30 days.1 The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to do one or the
other could result in the dismissal of his Complaint without prejudice.2 Despite this warning,
Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, filed a completed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, or
otherwise responded to the Court’s October 11 Order—and the time for doing so has expired.
Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and
Western Districts of Arkansas provides, in relevant part:
It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk
and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to
monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . .
. . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to
within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. . . .
Because Plaintiff has failed to respond, his Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal of this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
1
Order (Doc. 4). The Order was entered by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.
2
Id.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of November 2024.
_______________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?