Frazier v. Johnson et al

Filing 10

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 9 Order, plaintiff Carlos Ray Frazier's 2 complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. The Court recommends that in the future this dismissal be counted as a "strike". Signed by Chief Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/27/2025. (ldb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CARLOS RAY FRAZIER ADC #650936 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:24-cv-00936-KGB CAMERON JOHNSON, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Carlos Ray Frazier’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). The relief sought is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. The Court recommends that in the future this dismissal be counted as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). So adjudged this 27th day of January, 2025. _________________________ Kristine G. Baker Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?