Lee v. Hobbs
Filing
114
ORDER denying as moot 112 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Jimm Larry Hendren on 6/18/2013. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LEDELL LEE
PETITIONER
v.
CASE NUMBER 5:01CV00377JH
RAY HOBBS, Director of the
Arkansas Department of
Correction
RESPONDENT
O R D E R
Now
on
this
18th
day
of
June,
2013,
comes
on
for
consideration Petitioner's Motion To Hold This Case In Abeyance
Pending The Supreme Court's Decisions In Trevino v. Thaler, No.
11-10189 And Dansby v. Hobbs, No. 12-8582 (docket #112), and from
said motion, and the response thereto, the Court finds and orders
as follows:
1.
Now pending before the Court is a Petition For Writ Of
Habeas Corpus ("Habeas Petition") filed by petitioner Ledell Lee
("Lee").
Lee,
concerned
that
some
of
his
claims
may
be
procedurally defaulted by actions or inactions of his attorneys at
the State court level, in a Second Rule 37 Petition, asks that the
Court postpone resolving his Habeas Petition until the Supreme
Court decides the two pending cases cited in his motion.
2.
Both cases have now been decided.
See Dansby v. Hobbs,
--- S.Ct. ---, 2013 WL 506561 (June 3, 2013), and Trevino v.
Thaler, --- S.Ct. ---, 2013 WL 2300805 (May 28, 2013). The motion
is, therefore, moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion To Hold This
Case In Abeyance Pending The Supreme Court's Decisions In Trevino
v. Thaler, No. 11-10189 And Dansby v. Hobbs, No. 12-8582 (docket
#112) is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?