Lee v. Hobbs

Filing 114

ORDER denying as moot 112 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Jimm Larry Hendren on 6/18/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION LEDELL LEE PETITIONER v. CASE NUMBER 5:01CV00377JH RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT O R D E R Now on this 18th day of June, 2013, comes on for consideration Petitioner's Motion To Hold This Case In Abeyance Pending The Supreme Court's Decisions In Trevino v. Thaler, No. 11-10189 And Dansby v. Hobbs, No. 12-8582 (docket #112), and from said motion, and the response thereto, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Now pending before the Court is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus ("Habeas Petition") filed by petitioner Ledell Lee ("Lee"). Lee, concerned that some of his claims may be procedurally defaulted by actions or inactions of his attorneys at the State court level, in a Second Rule 37 Petition, asks that the Court postpone resolving his Habeas Petition until the Supreme Court decides the two pending cases cited in his motion. 2. Both cases have now been decided. See Dansby v. Hobbs, --- S.Ct. ---, 2013 WL 506561 (June 3, 2013), and Trevino v. Thaler, --- S.Ct. ---, 2013 WL 2300805 (May 28, 2013). The motion is, therefore, moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion To Hold This Case In Abeyance Pending The Supreme Court's Decisions In Trevino v. Thaler, No. 11-10189 And Dansby v. Hobbs, No. 12-8582 (docket #112) is denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?