Greene v. Norris

Filing 272

ORDER: The press of other business has delayed the Court in considering the pending Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion. In studying the file this week, I have learned that Greene wrote to the Court, and submitted materials, several times in February and March. Greene has asked the Court to deny the pending Rule 60 motion. The Clerk is directed to file one of the documents as a pro se motion to withdraw 257 and the other three documents as addenda to that motion. Counsel may, if they wish, respond to these filings by 10/9/2020. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/23/2020. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKAN AS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CAPITAL CASE PETITIONER JACK GORDON GREENE v. No. 5:04-cv-373-DPM DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The press of other business has delayed the Court in considering the pending Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion. In studying the file this week, I have learned that Greene wrote to the Court, and submitted materials, several times in February and March. It is unclear whether Greene sent copies of any of this correspondence to counsel, though much of the material appears to be older documents connected with the litigation and Greene's confinement. There is something new: Greene has asked the Court to deny the pending Rule 60 motion. I am therefore directing the Clerk to file one of the documents as a pro se motion to withdraw Doc. 25 7, and the other three documents as addenda to that motion. Counsel may, if they wish, respond to these filings by 9 October 2020. So Ordered. (/ D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?