Langford et al v. Ifedoria et al
ORDER Adopting 151 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 123 Motion to Sever; granting in part and denying in part 125 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 4/6/09. (mkf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MACK LANGFORD, ADC #94147, and JOHN HARDIN, ADC #108944 v. NNAMDI IFEDIORA, et al. ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, the medical Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 91) is GRANTED IN PART, with respect to Plaintiff Hardin's allegations against Defendant Ifediora, and DENIED with respect to his allegations against Defendant CMS. The ADC Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 120) is GRANTED IN PART, with respect to Plaintiffs' denial of medical care allegations against Defendants Kelley, Evans, Arkansas Department of Correction, Norris and Mobley, and DENIED in all other respects. Further, the medical Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 125) is GRANTED IN PART, with respect to Plaintiff Langford's allegations against Defendant CMS, and DENIED with respect to his allegations against Defendant Ifediora. Finally, Defendants' Motion to Sever (Doc. No. 123) is DENIED. 5:05CV00216-WRW-HLJ DEFENDANTS
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2009.
/s /Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?