Mills v. White et al

Filing 190

ORDER terminating the appointment of attorney, L. Ashley Higgins, and appointing attorney, Zachary Taylor, to represent the plaintiff in all further proceedings in this case; and holding the deft's summary judgment motion 182 in abeyance pending this appointment process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/9/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JON MILLS, ADC #86911 v. DAVID WHITE, et al. ORDER The Court has determined that the appointment of plaintiff's attorney, L. Ashley Higgins, shall be terminated. If counsel has received a copy of the file in this case, counsel is directed to return same to: United States District Court Clerk, 600 West Capitol Ave., Room 402, Little Rock, AR 72201-3325. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.7, Zachary Taylor, P.O. Box 8967, Pine Bluff, AR 71611-8967, 8709534-2551, is hereby appointed to represent plaintiff Jon Mills in all further proceedings in this action. THE CLERK IS HEREBY DIRECTED to send counsel and plaintiff a copy of this Order. Counsel is also directed to access and review Local Rule 83.7 regarding appointment of counsel, and Local Rule 83.6 regarding reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, through the Court's web site (www.are.uscourts.gov).1 Pursuant to Rule 83.7, counsel must make written application to withdraw within fifteen (15) days; otherwise, the appointment will be effective. Ruling on the defendant's summary judgment (Doc. No. 182) shall be held in abeyance pending this appointment process. 5:05CV00304BSM/JTK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF 1 Counsel may obtain a copy of the case file on disk by contacting the Courtroom Deputy. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2010. _______________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?