Kain v. Norris

Filing 12

PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pltf's petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 be dismissed pending an order from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals containing authorization for filing; Objections to R&R due by 5/22/2006. Signed by Judge Henry L. Jones Jr. on 5/10/06. (vjt)

Kain v. Norris

Doc. 12

Case 5:06-cv-00046-JLH

Document 12

Filed 05/10/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BILLY JACK KAIN vs. Civil Case No. 5:06CV00046 HLJ PETITIONER

LARRY NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS

RESPONDENT

The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Court Judge J. Leon Holmes. Any party may serve Objections

and file written objections to this recommendation.

should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding,

specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must

be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than eleven (11) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the same time that you file your written objections, include the following:

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-00046-JLH

Document 12

Filed 05/10/2006

Page 2 of 3

1. 2.

Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing before the District Judge (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge. The detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other nontestimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge. submission, the District Judge will determine the

3.

From

this

necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing, either before the Magistrate Judge or before the District Judge. Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: Clerk, United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 402 Little Rock, AR 72201-3325 DISPOSITION Petitioner has submitted what the court has determined to be a successive petition to his previously filed habeas cases, Kain v. Norris, PB-C-95-520 (D.E.Ark. June 7, 1996). The Eighth Circuit Kain

denied a certificate of appealability on September 5, 1996. v. Norris, No. 96-2862EAPB (Sept.5, 1996).

The amendments to 28

U.S.C. §2254 that were signed into law April 26, 1996, prohibit petitioners from filing successive petitions in the District Court without authorization from the Circuit Court of Appeals. The

requirements that must be met to obtain authorization from the Court of Appeals are found in 28 U.S.C. §2244(b), as amended. 2 The

Case 5:06-cv-00046-JLH

Document 12

Filed 05/10/2006

Page 3 of 3

amendments are available in the unit law library, or by contacting the Clerk, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse, 111 S. 10th Street, St. Louis, Mo. 63102, for more information. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this petition be, and it is hereby, dismissed pending an order from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals containing authorization for filing. SO ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2006.

United States Magistrate Judge

3