Palton v. Jackson

Filing 172

ORDER finding as moot 157 Motion to Quash; granting 159 Motion to Quash; granting 170 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and extending discovery ddl until May 8, 2009 and the motions ddl to May 22, 2009; granting 171 Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 4/9/09. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JASON DEON PALTON, ADC #95164 v. STEVEN JACKSON, et al. ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion to withdraw their motion to quash/for a protective order and plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of time to complete discovery and motions deadlines (DE ##170, 171). In addition, in his motion for extension, plaintiff indicates that his previously-filed motion to quash/for a protective order (DE #157) is now moot. Based on the parties' filings, it appears to the Court that the discovery dispute which prompted the filings of the parties' motions to quash has now been resolved. Therefore, those motions will be denied and defendants' motion to withdraw will be granted. In addition, the Court will grant plaintiff's motion for extension. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motion to withdraw (DE #171) their previously-filed motion to quash (DE #159) is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to quash (DE #157) is hereby DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend (DE #170) is hereby GRANTED. The discovery deadline in this action is now extended until May 8, 2009, and the motions deadline is extended until May 22, 2009. 5:06CV00198HLJ DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of April, 2009. __________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?