Edwards v. Davis et al

Filing 125

ORDER denying 120 Motion to Enforce as moot and denying defts' request for costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/13/10. (bkp)

Edwards v. Davis et al

Doc. 125

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAY B. EDWARDS, ADC# 134398 v. RONALD DAVIS, et al. ORDER Pending is Plaintiff's second pro se Motion to Enforce the parties' settlement agreement (Doc. No. 120). Defendants' Response1 indicates that all payments due under the settlement agreement have been made to Plaintiff's appointed agent, Ms. Cherry Mason (his mother). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce is DENIED as moot. Assuming that Ms. Mason is his authorized agent,2 I caution Plaintiff that future motions regarding enforcement of the settlement agreement should be made only after consulting with her. Defendants' request for costs and attorney's fees in this matter is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of October, 2010. 5:06CV00285-WRW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

/s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Doc. Nos. 123, 124.

Since Plaintiff does not complain about the payments that were the subject of his previous Motion to Enforce (Doc. No. 114), which were made to Ms. Mason, there is no reason to believe otherwise.

2

Dockets.Justia.com