Edwards v. Davis et al

Filing 125

ORDER denying 120 Motion to Enforce as moot and denying defts' request for costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/13/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Edwards v. Davis et al Doc. 125 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAY B. EDWARDS, ADC# 134398 v. RONALD DAVIS, et al. ORDER Pending is Plaintiff's second pro se Motion to Enforce the parties' settlement agreement (Doc. No. 120). Defendants' Response1 indicates that all payments due under the settlement agreement have been made to Plaintiff's appointed agent, Ms. Cherry Mason (his mother). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce is DENIED as moot. Assuming that Ms. Mason is his authorized agent,2 I caution Plaintiff that future motions regarding enforcement of the settlement agreement should be made only after consulting with her. Defendants' request for costs and attorney's fees in this matter is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of October, 2010. 5:06CV00285-WRW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. Nos. 123, 124. Since Plaintiff does not complain about the payments that were the subject of his previous Motion to Enforce (Doc. No. 114), which were made to Ms. Mason, there is no reason to believe otherwise. 2 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?