Wenzel v. Norris
ORDER granting 59 Motion for Reconsideration re 54 Memorandum and Order 55 Judgment and directing that this case be re-opened; appointing Thomas M. Hughes, III, 301 West Arch Street, Searcy, AR 72143, to represent plaintiff; and directing the Clerk to send counsel and plaintiff a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/20/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JOSEPH WENZEL v. LARRY NORRIS, et al. ORDER Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 29, 2009 Memorandum and Order and Judgment dismissing this case for failure to prosecute (DE #59), is hereby GRANTED. This case shall be RE-OPENED. Plaintiff is reminded of Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), which provides that pro se plaintiffs shall promptly notify the Court of changes in their address. The Court also has determined that counsel shall be appointed to represent the plaintiff. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and Local Rule 83.7, Thomas M. Hughes, III, 301 West Arch Street, Searcy, Arkansas, 72143, 501-279-6219, is hereby appointed to represent plaintiff Joseph Wenzel in all further proceedings in this action. THE CLERK IS HEREBY DIRECTED to send counsel and plaintiff a copy of this Order. Counsel is also directed to access and review Local Rule 83.7 regarding appointment of counsel, and Local Rule 83.6 regarding reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, through the Court's web site (www.are.uscourts.gov).1 Pursuant to Rule 83.7, counsel must make written application to withdraw within fifteen (15) days; otherwise, the appointment will be effective. 5:07CV00042JMM/HLJ DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
Counsel may obtain a copy of the case file, on disk, by contacting the Courtroom Deputy.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20
day of October
__________________________________ United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?