Miles v. Baker et al
ORDER adopting 94 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's 91 Motion for Contempt is DENIED, and Oscar Eve Jones IV is hereby appointed for the limited purpose of assisting Pltf in collecting the judgment he was awarded in this case; the Clerk is directed to send counsel a copy of this Order and a copy of Local Rule 83.7, and to forward a copy of the file 15 days after the entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/29/08. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARLON D. MILES ADC #99753 v. SAMUEL BAKER et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion for contempt (docket entry #91) is DENIED, and Oscar Eve Jones IV, of the Jones Law Firm-Batesville, P.O. Box 2662, Batesville, AR 72503-2662, is appointed for the limited purpose of assisting Plaintiff in collecting the judgment he was awarded in this case. The Clerk shall enter Mr. Jones's name as the attorney of record for Plaintiff and shall send counsel a copy of this order and a copy of Local Rule 83.7. The Clerk is also directed to forward counsel a copy of this file 15 days after the entry of this order. DATED this 29th day of December, 2008. NO: 5:07CV00081 JLH DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?