Sherman v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 and dismissing complaint with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick L Sherman. Signed by Judge James M Moody on 8/8/07. (bkp)
<![CDATA[
Sherman v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Doc. 7
Case 5:07-cv-00193-JMM
Document 7
Filed 08/08/2007
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PATRICK L. SHERMAN ADC #96304 V. 5:07CV000193 JMM/JTR PLAINTIFF
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, and LARRY NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction ORDE R
DEFENDANTS
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. The Court has considered all of plaintiff's objection including his contention that the three-strike provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) is unconstitutional and finds them to be without merit. See Higgins v. Carpenter, 258 F.3d 797, 801 (8th Cir.2001) cert. denied by Early v. Harmon, 535 U.S. 1040, 122 S.Ct. 1803, 152 L.Ed.2d 659 (2002). After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (docket entry #1) is DENIED,
pursuant to the three-strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 2. The Complaint (docket entry #2) is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:07-cv-00193-JMM
Document 7
Filed 08/08/2007
Page 2 of 2
3.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 8 day of August , 2007.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
