Hunter v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that Pltf's 2 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court's 45 Order of July 29, 2008; Objections to R&R due by 9/22/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/8/08. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS P I N E BLUFF DIVISION B I L L Y HUNTER V. CASE NO. 5:07cv00325-SWW-BD PLAINTIFF
A R K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al.
R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION
P r o c e d u r e for Filing Objections T h e following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District
C o u rt Judge Susan Webber Wright. Any party may serve and file written objections to th is recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or le g a l basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify th a t finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of yo u r objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no la te r than eleven (11) days from the date you receive the Recommended Disposition. A c o p y will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. M a il your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: C lerk , United States District Court E a ste rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325
B a c k gro u n d On December 27, 2007, Plaintiff Billy Hunter, formerly an Arkansas Department
o f Correction ("ADC") inmate, filed this case pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (docket e n try #2). Plaintiff also filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#5). On J a n u a ry 28, 2008, the Court granted Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#8 ). O n July 10, 2008, mail from the Court to Mr. Hunter, consisting of a copy of the S c h e d u lin g Order setting this case for an evidentiary hearing, was returned and marked " p a ro le d " (#43). Accordingly, on July 29, 2008, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a status re p o rt and new application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days to determine w h e th e r he should be required to pay all, or a portion, of the fees and costs of the lawsuit (# 4 5 ). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the Order could result in dismissal o f the action under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The Order was sent to Plaintiff's last known a d d re ss . Plaintiff has not responded to the Court and has not filed an updated application to proceed in forma pauperis within the time allowed. III. C o n c lu s io n T h e Court recommends that the District Court dismiss the Complaint (#2) without p re ju d ice , under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court's Order of July 2 9 , 2008 (#45).
DATED this 8th day of September, 2008.
___________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?