Gray v. Clark County Jail et al

Filing 110

ORDER directing the plaintiff to file a response to deft Moskovich's 96 MOTION for Summary Judgment within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/23/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RUFFUS GRAY, ADC #141375 v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL, et al. ORDER Defendant A. Moskovich, the sole remaining defendant in this action, filed a motion for summary judgment on February 3, 2010 (Doc. No. 96). By Order dated March 2, 2010, this Court directed plaintiff to file a response to the motion within ten days of the date of the Order (Doc. No. 99). The Court further advised plaintiff that failure to respond could result in the dismissal without prejudice of his complaint, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Plaintiff has not filed a response, but the interlocutory appeal he filed on December 3, 2009 was dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 5, 2010 (Doc. No. 107). Therefore, this Court will provide plaintiff one final opportunity in which to respond to defendant's motion. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that plaintiff shall file a response to defendant's motion for summary judgment within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order. Failure to file such may result in the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's complaint. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2010. 5:08CV00128JMM-JTK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?