Planters Cotton Oil Mill Inc v. English Boiler & Tube Inc et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to settlement of all claims. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/22/09. (mkf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Pine Bluff Division
PLANTERS COTTON OIL MILL, INC,
ENGLlSH BOILER & TUBE, INC, et. aI.,
) ) ) )
) ) )
Case No" 5:08cv0180
JOINT DISMISSAL ORDER
This day came the plaintiff/counterclaim-defendant, Planters Cotton Oil Mill, Inc ("Planters"), and the defendantlcounterclaimant, English Boiler & Tube, Inc" ("English Boiler"), by counsel, and represented to the Court that all matters of controversy between them have been resolved and jointly move the Court fOJ an Order dismissing all claims among the parties, in the above-styled civil action, with prejudice. Having considered the matter, and there being no oqjection, it is hereby ADJUDGED,
ORDERED, and DECREED that all claims filed by the parties, in the above-styled matter are
IT IS SO ORDERED
APPROVED AND LED TO:
G. S e ce Fricke (Ark. Bar No. 79068) S. Brent Wakefield (Ark. Bar No. BIN 99144) Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, PA. 2700 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Tel.: 501.372.6175 Fax.: 501..375.2&02 E-mail: email@example.com E~mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Counsel for Planters Cotton Oil Mill, Inc.
Wm. Dean Overstreet (Ark. Bar No. 79228) Monte D. Estes (Ark. Bar No,. 89150) Dover Dixon Home, PLLC 425 West Capitol, Suite 3700 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Tel.: 501..375.9151 Fax.: 501..375.64&4 E~mail: email@example.com E-mail: mestes@ddh~ar.com Counsellor English Boiler & Tube, Inc Christopher M. Malone (VSB No. 1867&) (Pro hac vice) Neil S. Talegaonkar (VSB No. 44589) (Pro hac vice) ThompsonMcMullan, p.e 100 Shockoe Slip Richmond, Virginia 23219 TeL: 804.649.7545 Fax.: 804.780.181.3 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org E~mail: email@example.com Counsel for English Boiler & Tube, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?