Planters Cotton Oil Mill Inc v. English Boiler & Tube Inc et al

Filing 73

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to settlement of all claims. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/22/09. (mkf)

Download PDF
. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS Pine Bluff Division PLANTERS COTTON OIL MILL, INC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, v" ENGLlSH BOILER & TUBE, INC, et. aI., DefendantfCounterclaimant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No" 5:08cv0180 JOINT DISMISSAL ORDER This day came the plaintiff/counterclaim-defendant, Planters Cotton Oil Mill, Inc ("Planters"), and the defendantlcounterclaimant, English Boiler & Tube, Inc" ("English Boiler"), by counsel, and represented to the Court that all matters of controversy between them have been resolved and jointly move the Court fOJ an Order dismissing all claims among the parties, in the above-styled civil action, with prejudice. Having considered the matter, and there being no oqjection, it is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that all claims filed by the parties, in the above-styled matter are dismissed, with pr~judice, IT IS SO ORDERED ," '" APPROVED AND LED TO: / ./ G. S e ce Fricke (Ark. Bar No. 79068) S. Brent Wakefield (Ark. Bar No. BIN 99144) Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, PA. 2700 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Tel.: 501.372.6175 Fax.: 501..375.2&02 E-mail: E~mail: Counsel for Planters Cotton Oil Mill, Inc. Wm. Dean Overstreet (Ark. Bar No. 79228) Monte D. Estes (Ark. Bar No,. 89150) Dover Dixon Home, PLLC 425 West Capitol, Suite 3700 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Tel.: 501..375.9151 Fax.: 501..375.64&4 E~mail: E-mail: Counsellor English Boiler & Tube, Inc Christopher M. Malone (VSB No. 1867&) (Pro hac vice) Neil S. Talegaonkar (VSB No. 44589) (Pro hac vice) ThompsonMcMullan, p.e 100 Shockoe Slip Richmond, Virginia 23219 TeL: 804.649.7545 Fax.: 804.780.181.3 E-mail: E~mail: Counsel for English Boiler & Tube, Inc 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?