Holloway v. Sweet et al
ORDER granting 144 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/27/10. (bkp)
Holloway v. Weast et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WINSTON HOLLOWAY v. MARIE AUSTIN, et al. ORDER Pending is Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 144). Defendants have responded and do not object.1 Plaintiff, an inmate at Cummins Unit, seeks to limit evidence and testimony about his criminal charges and convictions in his civil trial.2 Plaintiff's criminal charges and convictions are not relevant to the issues presented by his prison conditions claim, and would be highly prejudicial. Defendants agree that the evidence at issue is not relevant. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine is GRANTED. Accordingly, evidence or testimony about the nature of Plaintiff's criminal charges and convictions are inadmissible as evidence in this trial. Defendant is prohibited from questioning any witness or prospective juror in any way that would suggest or imply the nature of Plaintiff's criminal charges and convictions. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of October, 2010. /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5:08CV00196-WRW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
Doc. No. 146. Docs. Nos. 144, 145. 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?