Holloway v. Sweet et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's claims against deft Marie Boardman; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for each of the other defts and the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of the original and amended complaints with any attachments by serving the Humphries and Lewis Law Firm. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 9/30/08. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WINSTON HOLLOWAY ADC #67507 V. ANEDA SWEET, et al ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau. There have been no objections. The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant "Marie Boardman" are hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Plaintiff's case shall proceed against Defendants Austin, Sweet, and Stacy Boardman only. Service is now appropriate for Defendants. The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a summons for each Defendant, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the original and amended complaints with any attachments (doc. 2, 5), and a summons for each Defendant through Humphries and Lewis law firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, Arkansas 71612, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.1 Should Defendants need copies of other filed documents, they are available from the Clerk's office or may be accessed through the PACER system for the United States District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2008. 5:08-cv-00196 WRW-JWC DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.______________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE It is not necessary for the Clerk to send a copy for each CMS employee. Humphries and Lewis has indicated the need for only two (2) copies of all pleadings. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?