Pitman et al v. Engstrom et al

Filing 68

ORDER Adopting 59 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects; plaintiff's claims of deliberate indifference to his "sexual addiction" disorder are DISMISSED, and defendant Doctor Engstrom is DISMISSED as a party defendant. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/3/2009. (mkf)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CURTIS PITMAN ADC # 119869 V. 5:08CV00198 BSM/HDY DEFENDANTS ORDER The court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's claims of deliberate indifference to his "sexual addiction" disorder are DISMISSED, and defendant Doctor Engstrom is DISMISSED as a party defendant. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2009. PLAINTIFF EDWARD ENGSTROM, et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?