Plunk v. Norris
ORDER denying as moot 79 Respondent's Partial Motion to Quash Subpoenas of non-parties Chris Carter and Wes Bradford. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 6/30/10. (vjt)
Plunk v. Hobbs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TERRY GALE PLUNK ADC #139430 V. NO. 5:08cv00203 SWW-JWC RESPONDENT ORDER Respondent has filed a partial motion to quash subpoenas of non-parties Chris Carter and Wes Bradford (doc 79), whose depositions are scheduled for July 1, 2010. In response (doc. 78), Petitioner says he has no opposition to the motion, was not contacted regarding the issue, and is withdrawing the requests to produce the criminal files mentioned in the subpoenas duces tecum. Respondent's motion is denied as moot. Compliance with Local Rule 7.2(g) regarding this issue would have saved the Court and the parties significant time.1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2010. PETITIONER
LARRY NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The rule provides:
All motions to compel discovery and all other discovery-enforcement motions and all motions for protective orders shall contain a statement by the moving party that the parties have conferred in good faith on the specific issue or issues in dispute and that they are not able to resolve their disagreements without the intervention of the Court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?