Winston v. Evans et al

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING 32 Partial Report and Recommendations granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Default Judgment and 27 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Eric Winston and directing the Clerk of the Court to enter deft Tinsley's default and directing deft Tinsley to respond, no later than 15 days after the entry of this Order, to plaintiff's request for the entry of a default judgment against her; and further directing the Clerk of the Court to forward a copy of this Order to deft Tinsley at the address indicated on the Marshal's return of service. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/29/08. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ERIC WINSTON ADC #105483 V. FRED EVANS et al. NO: 5:08CV00204 JMM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's motions for default (docket entries #27 & #31) are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. Plaintiff's motions are GRANTED with respect to Defendant Tinsley. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to enter Tinsley's default. 3. 4. Plaintiff's motions are DENIED with respect to Defendant Evans. Tinsley is directed to respond, no later than 15 days after the entry of this order, to Plaintiff's request for the entry of a default judgment against her. 5. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to forward a copy of this order to Defendant 1 Tinsley at the address indicated on the Marshal's return of service (docket entry #14). DATED this 29th day of December, 2008. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?