White et al v. Adams et al
ORDER adopting 4 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, purs to 28 USC 1915A, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as being duplicative of the claims in Huggins and White v. W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Center, 5:08-cv-00216-JMM-HDY; Pltf's Motions 1 2 for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED AS MOOT; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/5/08. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION LATRELL T. WHITE; and REGINALD HUGGINS V. 5:08CV00217 SWW/JTR DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is
E. ADAMS, Unit Supervisor, W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Center, et al.
DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, as being duplicative of the claims in Huggins and White v. W. C. Dub Brassell Detention Center, 5:08CV00216 JMM/HDY. 2. The Applications to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (docket entries #1 and #2) are
DENIED, AS MOOT. 3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 5th day of September 2008. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?