Jones v. Hobbs et al
ORDER ADOPTING 168 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, deft Conrad's motion for summary judgment 160 is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety; pltf's motion for dismissal of appointed counsel and extension of time to file additional objections 169 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/28/12. (vjt) (Docket enty modified on 3/29/2012 to correct the file date.) (thd).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LARRY WAYNE JONES,
RAY HOBBS, Chief Deputy Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction; et al.,
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed on Plaintiff’s behalf by appointed
counsel; however, Plaintiff has filed a pro se motion to dismiss appointed counsel, and he
requests additional time to file objections. In support of his motion, Plaintiff states specific
objections to the recommended disposition. After careful review of the proposed findings and
recommendations and Plaintiff’s pro se objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the
Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Conrad’s motion for summary judgment
(docket entry #160) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for dismissal of appointed counsel
and extension of time to file additional objections (docket entry #169) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?