Muldrow v. Adams et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 3 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's complaint 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice; this dismissal will count as a "strike" purs to 28 USC 1915(g); the Court certifies that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith; denying as moot Pltf's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; judgment will entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/15/08. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION VEOTIS MULDROW ADC #123054 V. ED ADAM, et al. ORDER The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommended Disposition, the timely objections filed thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety. Accordingly, the Complaint (docket entry #2) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The dismissal will count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED (#1) as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of September, 2008. NO. 5:08CV000237 SWW-BD DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?