Rideout v. Potts
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the District Court dismiss 2 Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court's 10 Order of 10/23/08. Objections to R&R due by 12/18/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 12/3/08. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION E R I C RIDEOUT V. S U S A N POTTS R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION I. P r o c e d u r e for Filing Objections: T h e following Recommended Disposition has been sent to United States District Ju d g e Brian S. Miller. Any party may serve and file written objections to this re c o m m e n d a tio n . Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal b a sis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that f in d in g and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your o b je c tio n s must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later th a n eleven (11) days from the date you receive the Recommended Disposition. A copy w ill be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in w a iv e r of the right to appeal questions of fact. M a il your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: C lerk , United States District Court E a ste rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325 CASE NO. 5:08CV00252 BSM/BD DEFENDANT P L A IN T IF F
B a c k gro u n d : On September 4, 2008, Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Drew County Detention
C e n t e r, filed this lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (docket entry #2). Plaintiff also m o v e d to proceed in forma pauperis (#1). On September 9, 2008, the Court issued an O rd e r (#3) granting the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and notifying Plaintiff of his re sp o n sib ility to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Since then, all of the mailings to P la in tif f have been returned as undeliverable (#5, #7, #12). On October 23, 2008, the Court ordered Plaintiff to provide notice of his new a d d re ss on or before November 27, 2008, and state whether he wishes to proceed with his la w s u it (#10). Plaintiff was notified that failure to timely comply with the Court's order c o u ld result in dismissal of his case. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's Order. Accordingly, the Court recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint (#2) be dismissed without p rejud ice for failure to comply with the Court's Order (#10) and Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). III. C o n clu s io n : T h e Court recommends that the District Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint w ith o u t prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court's O rd e r of October 23, 2008 (#10). DATED this 3rd day of December, 2008.
____________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?