Dunmore v. Cole et al
ORDER reminding Plaintiff to timely and properly file his Statement of Disputed Facts in compliance with 88 Order or otherwise, all of the facts set forth in Defendant's summary judgment papers could be deemed admitted by Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/14/09. (mkf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION EDWARD CHARLES DUNMORE V. BRENT COLE, Lieutenant, Sheridan Detention Center; and GENTRY DEPRIEST, Officer, Sheridan Detention Center ORDE R On August 31, 2009, the Court entered an Order giving Plaintiff thirty days to file a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and a Statement of Disputed Facts. See docket entry #88. On September 4, 2009, Plaintiff filed his Response. See docket entry #91. However, he has not filed his Statement of Disputed Facts. The Court reminds Plaintiff that, if he fails to timely and properly file his Statement of Disputed Facts (in compliance with the specific instructions set forth in the Court's August 31, 2009 Order), all of the facts set forth in Defendant's summary judgment papers could be deemed admitted by Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c). It is so ordered this 14th day of September, 2009. 5:08CV00255 BSM/JTR PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?