Haynes v. Norris
ORDER denying Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/20/10. (dac)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES KELLY HAYNES ADC # 83056 V. 5:08CV00337 JMM DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is Petitioner's Notice of Appeal which the Court deems an Application for Certificate of Appealability. The Court will consider the motion for certificate of appealability under 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). In order for this Court to grant a certificate of appealability, the petitioner must make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518 (8th Cir. 1997). A "substantial showing" is one in which a petitioner demonstrates that his "issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner]; or that the questions are `adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983)(discussing necessary showing under previous law dealing with certificates of probable cause). In this case, Petitioner has failed to make such a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, the Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Docket # 37) is DENIED. Plaintiff may file this motion with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
LARRY NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2010.
______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?