Adams v. Hobbs et al

Filing 52

ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 11/4/09. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BILLY TIRRELL ADAMS, ADC #101322 v. RAY HOBBS, et al. ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to compel (DE #43). Defendants have filed a response in opposition to the motion (DE #49). In support of the motion to compel, plaintiff states he submitted interrogatories and requests for production of documents to the medical defendants on August 17, 2009. Plaintiff further states a letter from defendants dated September 16, 2009 requested a two-week extension, and that he has not yet received defendants' responses. Defendants respond to the motion by stating that their responses were mailed to plaintiff on October 2, 2009, within the two-week extension period, and that plaintiff's motion should be denied. In light of defendants' response, the Court will deny the motion, without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (DE #43) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2009. PLAINTIFF 5:08CV00343HLJ DEFENDANTS __________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?