Johnson v. Adams et al
Filing
82
ORDER adopting in its entirety 78 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; and granting 49 Separate Defendant Carl Johnson, M.D.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing, with prejudice, Plaintiff's Complaint against Separate Defendant Carl Johnson. Signed by Judge Jimm Larry Hendren on 3/31/10. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION VINCENT SHARNEE JOHNSON v. Civil No. 09-00002 PLAINTIFF
EDWARD EARL ADAMS, Acting Chief, W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Center; RANDY MORGAN, Jail Administrator, Pulaski County Jail; DR. CARL JOHNSON, Pulaski County Jail; and JIM HAYES, Deputy, United States Marshal Service ORDER
DEFENDANTS
N O W on this 31st day of March 2010, comes on for consideration t h e Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document # 7 8 ) , filed on March 8, 2010, to which there are no objections, and t h e Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is sound in all respects, and should be adopted in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #78) is adopted in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Separate Defendant Carl Johnson, M.D.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (document #49) is GRANTED and plaintiff's complaint as against Separate Defendant Carl Johnson is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?