Long v. Broughton et al
ORDER denying 109 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/14/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS P I N E BLUFF DIVISION C L Y D E R. LONG, A D C # 137424 V. No. 5:09CV00015 SWW-BD DEFENDANTS
P L A IN T IF F
S T E P H E N BROUGHTON, et al.
ORDER N o w pending is Plaintiff's motion to compel (docket entry #109). In his motion, P la in tif f complains that Defendant Broughton has not responded to Plaintiff's second set o f interrogatories filed in this matter on July 9, 2009 (#89). Defendant Broughton now h a s responded to Plaintiff's motion (#120). In his response, Defendant Broughton admits th a t he has not responded to Plaintiff's discovery requests, but states that Plaintiff agreed to provide Defendant Broughton additional time to respond to the discovery requests after P la in tif f completed a medical release form. Accordingly, at this time, the Court DENIES P la in tif f 's motion to compel (#109). IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of September, 2009.
____________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?