Ashford v. Johnson et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40 and granting 35 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution filed by defendants; dismissing case with prejudice; denying all pending motions as moot; and certifying that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/16/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CHARLES ASHFORD ADC #133975 V. RODERICK JOHNSON et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully NO: 5:09CV00023 JMM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (docket entry #35) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's
complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. 2. 3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 16 day of December, 2009.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?