Tucker v. Potts et al
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the District Court dismiss the 2 Complaint without prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court's Orders of 3/12/09 and 4/21/09. Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 5/18/09. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS P I N E BLUFF DIVISION
L A N C E ANTHONY TUCKER VS. S U S A N POTTS A N D MARK GOBER NO. 5:09CV00076-SWW-BD
R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION I. P r o c e d u r e for Filing Objections T h e following Recommended Disposition has been sent to United States District Ju d g e Susan Webber Wright. Any party may serve and file written objections to this re c o m m e n d a tio n . Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal b a sis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that f in d in g and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your o b je c tio n s must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later th a n eleven (11) days from the date you receive the Recommended Disposition. A copy w ill be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in w a iv e r of the right to appeal questions of fact. M a il your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: C lerk , United States District Court E a ste rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325
B a c k gro u n d O n March 11, 2009, Plaintiff Lance Anthony Tucker filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983
a c tio n (docket entry #2) pro se, along with a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma p a u p e r is (#1). On March 12, 2009, this Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma p a u p e r is and ordered him to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the entry of th e Order (#3). The Order notified Plaintiff of his duties under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and c a u tio n e d Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Order could result in dismissal of his c o m p lain t (#3). Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. O n April 21, 2009, the Court noted that Plaintiff was no longer incarcerated in the D r e w County Detention Facility and ordered Plaintiff to provide notice of his new address (# 7 ). In addition, this Court again ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was given until May 16, 2009, to comply. Plaintiff has failed to provide his new a d d re s s or file an amended complaint, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, P lain tiff 's Complaint (#2) should be dismissed without prejudice under Local Rule 5 .5 ( c ) ( 2 ) . III. C o n c lu s io n T h e Court recommends that the District Court dismiss the Complaint (#2) without p re ju d ic e , under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court's Orders of
M arc h 12, 2009 (#3) and April 21, 2009 (#7). D A T E D this 18th day of May, 2009.
___________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?