LeFlore v. Reed et al

Filing 96

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 93 . Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/3/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
LeFlore v. Reed et al Doc. 96 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KING LEFLORE ADC #133845 V. CYNTHIA REED, CO-II, Varner Super Max ADC; and RODERICK JOHNSON, Lieutenant, Varner Super Max ADC PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT 5:09CV00143 SWW/JTR DEFENDANT/COUNTER-CLAIMANT DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, King LeFlore, on his excessive force claim against Defendant/Counter-Claimant, Cynthia Reed, in the amount of one dollar ($1.00). 2. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant/Counter-Claimant, Cynthia Reed, on her battery claim against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, King LeFlore, in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 3. Plaintiff King LeFlore's failure to protect claim against Defendant, Roderick Johnson, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. Dated this 3rd day of September, 2010. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?