Briley v. Ford et al
Filing
24
ORDER directing the pro se plaintiff to notify the Court of his current address and his intent to continue prosecution with this action within 30 days of the date of this Order, as the 21 Scheduling Order dated June 17, 2010 was returned to sender. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/8/10. (bkp)
Briley v. Ford et al
Doc. 24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION EDDIE BRILEY v. C. FORD, et al. ORDER On June 23, 2010, a copy of the June 17, 2010 Scheduling Order which was mailed to plaintiff at his last-known address, was returned to sender (Doc. No. 23). Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), a pro se plaintiff must promptly notify the Clerk of the Court and other parties of any change in his address, and must monitor the progress of the case and prosecute it diligently. Furthermore, the Local Rule provides for the dismissal without prejudice of any action in which communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty days. Although plaintiff has apparently changed his address, this Order will be sent to his lastknown address. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify this Court of his current address and his intent to continue prosecution with this action, pro se, within thirty days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2010. 5:09CV00174BSM/JTK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?