Shell Trademark Management BV et al v. Flabama Petro Inc

Filing 58

ORDER re #37 MOTION for Contempt filed by Shell Trademark Management BV, Motiva Enterprises LLC: Motion is granted and Plaintiffs are authorized to remove their trademarks and trade dress from store locations at 601 North Hutchinson in Pine Bluff, Arkansas and U.S. Highway 65 in Humnoke, Arkansas, thereafter the Plaintiffs may submit evidence of their costs and expenses, and the Court will award judgment in an appropriate amount against Gamma Mart Corporation and Iota Mart Corporation. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/4/10. (bkp) (Docket entry modified on 11/9/2010 to correct the file date and the signature date.) (thd)

Download PDF
Shell Trademark Management BV et al v. Flabama Petro Inc Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION SHELL TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT BV and MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC VS. CASE NO. 5:09-CV-0192JMM DEFENDANTS ORDER On October 29, 2010, Plaintiffs' Motion for Contempt (Doc. 37) came on for hearing. Plaintiffs appeared by and through their attorney, John P. Talbot, and Gamma Mart Corporation and Iota Mart Corporation failed to appear. From the Motion, the statements of counsel and the other facts and matter before it, the Court finds that the Motion for Contempt should be granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 70 (a), Plaintiffs are authorized through agents or contractors to enter upon and fully remove their trademarks and trade dress from the store locations at 601 North Hutchinson in Pine Bluff, Arkansas and U.S. Highway 65 in Humnoke, Arkansas. After the removal, Plaintiffs may submit evidence of their costs and expenses, and the Court will award judgment in an appropriate amount against Gamma Mart Corporation and Iota Mart Corporation. IT IS SO ORDERED. PLAINTIFFS FLABAMA PETRO, INC. ET AL. ___________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE November 4, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?