Weary et al v. Strong Manufacturing Company Inc et al

Filing 76

ORDER authorizing the individuals named in this Order to bring certain electronics into the George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Pine Bluff between Monday, April 4, 2011, and Friday, April 8, 2011. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/28/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
Weary et al v. Strong Manufacturing Company Inc et al Doc. 76 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION STEPHEN AND ROBIN WEARY v. STRONG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., et al. ORDER Charles L. Schlumberger, Joseph W. Price, Annette Kline, Michael Kline, Eddie Singleton, Ben Chandler, Steve Stroud, Michael Davis, Steven Appleton, Timothy Allen, II, Sherry M. Murphy, Theodore Schwartz, Wayne Mehlin, Anna Johnson, Deborah Griffin, Mary Zelhof, Stephen Weary, Robin Weary, Mary Ann King, William "Rocky" Ford, Edward Karnes, and Charles Venus are hereby authorized to bring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into the George Howard, Jr., Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Pine Bluff between Monday, April 4, 2011, and Friday, April 8, 2011, subject to the following rules: (a) The devices mentioned above may not be used to record, photograph, or film anyone or anything inside the courthouse. (b) (c) Cell phones must be turned off and put away when in the courtroom. Wireless internet components of electronic devices must be deactivated when in district courtrooms. (d) Before persons with electronic devices are granted entry into the courthouse, all devices must be examined by the United States Marshals Service or Court NO. 5:09CV00225 BSM PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Dockets.Justia.com Security Personnel. This examination includes, but is not limited to placing the devise through electronic screening machines and requiring the person possessing the device to turn the power to the device off and on. (e) The United States Marshals Service may further restrict electronic devices from entering the building should a threat assessment so dictate. A violation of paragraph (a), (b), or (c) may result in seizure of the electronic devices, withdrawal of the privilege to bring an electronic device into the courthouse, or other sanctions. A violation of the prohibition on recording, photographing, or filming anyone or anything inside the courthouse may be punished as contempt of court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?