Hearod v. Franklin
JUDGMENT re 7 Order on Report and Recommendations; the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; the dismissal consitutes a "strike" as defined by 28 USC 1915(g); the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3), that an ifp appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/23/09. (mkf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BENNIE HEAROD ADC #113427 V. JOANNA Z. FRANKLIN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Maximum Security Unit, et al. JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that the Complaint is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal constitutes a "strike" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 23rd day of December, 2009. 5:09CV00330 JMM/JTR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?