Hobbs v. Falco et al
ORDER denying 94 Notice of Appeal filed by Harold Hobbs of 92 Order. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/19/10. (bkp)
Hobbs v. Fulco et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION HAROLD HOBBS ADC #77219 v. BRENDA FULCO et al. ORDER On September 9, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young entered an order [Doc. No. 92] denying plaintiff's motion for an examination by an outside dentist, and denying his motion for production of documents as more appropriate for a discovery request. Plaintiff appeals [Doc No. 94] that order. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the magistrate's order will only be reconsidered if it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See also Local Rule 72.1.VII.B. Nothing in Judge Young's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law and plaintiff's request for reconsideration of Judge Young's order in his DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2010. NO: 5:09-cv-00368 BSM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
_______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?