Natt v. Tate et al
Filing
65
JUDGMENT re 64 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/12/10. (bkp)
<![CDATA[
Natt v. Tate et al
Doc. 65
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION LaWAYNE NATT ADC #119599 V. DONALD TATE et al. JUDGMENT Pursuant to the order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Donald Tate, Gaylon Lay, Larry Norris, Jrod Price, Danny Burl, and Darren Dill, and with prejudice with respect to his claims against Defendants Eddie Knight and Climestene Owens; the relief sought is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 12th day of October, 2010. NO: 5:09CV00374 JMM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
