Starr v. Kelley et al

Filing 59

ORDER ADOPTING 57 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, pltf's claims against deft Suphan are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Purnima Adhikari Suphan terminated. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/3/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Starr v. Kelley et al Doc. 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WILLIE J. STARR ADC #109194 v. WENDY KELLEY, et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Purnima Adhikari Suphan are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of August, 2010. NO. 5:10CV00014 JLH/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?