Miller/Perry v. Norris

Filing 55

ORDER denying pltf's 41 Motion for Depositions by Written Questions; granting defts' 45 Motion to Stay Discovery, except that defts are directed to provide pltf with any discovery related to exhaustion of grievances regarding the issue s in this case; granting pltf's 47 Motion to Amend proposed witness list; granting pltf's 51 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to defts' 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment; pltf's response is due no later than 30 days after the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/13/10. (vjt)

Miller/Perry v. Norris

Doc. 55

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION FRANCES RENEE MILLER/PERRY ADC #708998 V. LARRY NORRIS et al. ORDE R Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on July 1, 2010. On July 12, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a 30 day extension of time to file a response to that motion. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion (docket entry #51) is GRANTED, and her response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment is due no later than 30 days after the entry of this order. In light of this extension, Defendants' motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion for summary judgment (docket entry #45) is GRANTED in all respects, except that Defendants are directed to provide to Plaintiff any discovery related to her exhaustion of her grievances regarding the issues in this case. Thus, Plaintiff's motion for depositions by written questions (docket entry #41) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to amend her proposed witness list by adding certain individuals (docket entry #47) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13 day of July, 2010. NO: 5:10CV00019 JMM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com