Babb v. Norris

Filing 20

ORDER adopting 19 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, the petitions for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254 filed by Jason Babb are dismissed; all requested relief is denied, and a certificate of appealability is denied; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/21/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Babb v. Hobbs Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JASON BABB PETITIONER v. NO. 5:10CV00025 JMM RAY HOBBS, interim Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After a careful, de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. This proceeding and the petitions for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by petitioner Jason Babb are dismissed. All requested relief is denied, and, in accordance with Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is denied.1 Judgment will be entered for respondent Ray Hobbs. 1 The Court is not convinced that Babb can "demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?