Stewart v. Hobbs et al

Filing 43

ORDER denying 36 Motion to Compel; denying 36 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/27/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Stewart v. Hobbs et al Doc. 43 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BARRY W. STEWART ADC #90371 V. RAY HOBBS et al. ORDE R On July 20, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery, and for sanctions (docket entry #36). Defendants filed a response on July 26, 2010 (docket entry #38). Plaintiff's motion generally complains that Defendants' discovery responses, in particular his requests for admission, were evasive, but fails to identify the specific requests at issue. Defendants' response to Plaintiff's motion indicates that they have responded to his discovery requests, although Plaintiff may take issue with some responses. Without specific identification of the discovery requests in dispute, Plaintiff is not entitled to an order compelling responses, or for sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to compel and for sanctions (docket entry #36) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 day of July, 2010. NO: 5:10CV00027 HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?